Redistricting. State Senate Districts.

- Pros & Cons -

Proposition 40

Redistricting. State Senate Districts.

Referendum

Regional impact:

The Question: 

Should the current state Senate districts be retained?

The Situation: 

Every ten years, after the federal census, the boundaries of the districts from which we elect our representatives are redrawn in order to ensure that there is equal population in each district. This redistricting was formerly done by the Legislature; however, in 2008, voters approved Proposition 11, which created a citizens commission to do redistricting for state offices, and, in 2010, they approved Proposition 20, which added redistricting of congressional districts to the duties of the commission.

The commission is comprised of 14 members: 5 Democrats, 5 Republicans, and 4 members not affiliated with either party. The commission finished its work in August 2011, and certified the new Senate district maps by a vote of 13 to 1. 

The California Constitution allows voters to challenge the district maps through the referendum process if enough registered voters sign a petition to qualify a referendum for the ballot. Those who were unhappy with the new state Senate districts gathered signatures for a referendum, and, in November 2011, petitioned the California Supreme Court to determine which maps would be used for the 2012 primary and general elections if the referendum qualified for the ballot. The referendum did qualify, but the Court ruled that the maps certified by the commission would be used in this year’s elections, regardless of the referendum. Once a measure has qualified for the ballot, it cannot be removed, so the sponsors of the referendum, who no longer found it necessary, were unable to take it off the ballot.

The Proposal: 

Prop 40 is a referendum that asks the voters to approve or reject the current state Senate districts. A YES vote approves the existing districts, and a NO vote rejects them. If the current districts are approved, they would stay in effect until after the next federal census in 2020. If the current districts are rejected, "Special Masters" appointed by the California Supreme Court would draw new district maps to be used until after the next census.

Fiscal Effect: 

If the voters vote YES and approve the current maps, there would be no effect on state or local government. If the voters vote NO, and reject the current maps, there would be a one-time cost to the state of about $500,000 to pay for the drawing of the new districts, plus a one-time cost statewide of about another $500,000 for counties to develop new election precinct maps and materials.

A YES Vote Means: 

The state Senate district boundaries certified by the Citizens Redistricting Commission would continue to be used.

A NO Vote Means: 

The California Supreme Court would appoint special masters to determine new state Senate district boundaries.

Supporters Say: 

Even though the proponents of the referendum have abandoned their cause, a YES vote is necessary in order to retain the current districts and uphold the will of the people in creating the commission.

Opponents Say: 

They are no longer asking for a NO vote. Their intention was to stop the current Senate districts from being implemented in 2012. Since the Court ruled to keep those districts in place, Prop 40 is not needed.

LWVC Education Fund