Proposition 72: 2018

Proposition 72

Permits Legislature to Exclude Newly Constructed Rain-Capture Systems From Property-Tax Reassessment Requirement.

people reviewing sample ballot and Voter Information Guide

The Measure

Measure Identification

Measure ID: Proposition 72
Measure Name: Permits Legislature to Exclude Newly Constructed Rain-Capture Systems From Property-Tax Reassessment Requirement.
Type of Ballot Measure: Legislative Constitutional Amendment
Election: 2018 Primary
Assembly Bill Number: SCA 9
Chapter: Resolution Chapter 1

The Outcome

PASSED

The Question

Should the value of new construction of rain-capture systems be excluded from reassessment of property for property taxes purposes?

The Situation

California property taxes are typically charged at 1.1% of the full cash value of the property, initially assessed at the time of purchase or construction. This taxable value can be adjusted for inflation at a rate of no more than 2% per year. Normally a property’s value is not fully updated until it is sold or changes owners, but certain improvements can also trigger an updated value. In that case, only the value of the improvement (usually a major renovation or new construction) is considered, and this value is then added to the taxable base value of the property. A few types of improvements are already excluded from reassessment: solar energy systems, fire sprinkler systems, changes to increase accessibility for people with disabilities, and seismic retrofitting.

The Proposal

Prop 72 would add systems installed by property owners or developers to catch rainwater and store it for use on the property to the list of improvements excluded from reassessment for property taxes.  The exclusion is only for systems installed between January 2018 and the end of 2028. The exclusion ends when the property is sold.

Fiscal Effect

Tax exemptions are generally thought to provide incentives, in this case to encourage property owners to install rain-capture systems by exempting them from property tax reassessments at the time of installation. Because these systems are usually not very expensive compared to the total cost of real estate, individual tax savings would be fairly small. The loss to local government revenue from property taxes would also be correspondingly small, though this amount would increase if the incentive succeeds in encouraging construction of more rain-capture systems. The property owner would save money on water bills by using the water captured by the system, also conserving water from public utilities for other uses, including drinking water and agricultural irrigation.

A YES Vote Means

Installing a system to collect and store rainwater on a property could not result in a higher property tax bill.

A NO Vote Means

Installing a system to collect and store rainwater on a property could result in a higher property tax bill.

Supporters Say

  • In a state prone to drought, Prop 72 provides a financial incentive for homeowners to help conserve water.
  • Savings from Prop 72 will extend to lower water bills for people with rain-capture systems.

Opponents Say

  • There are no official arguments against and no opponents to this bill.

Link to Official Support

This Proposition is on the ballot by action of the Legislature and the Governor. At press time there is no known formal campaign supporting this Proposition.

Link to Official Opposition

At press time there is no known formal campaign against this Proposition.

View All Ballot Measures

Look up Your Ballot with VOTE411

Election Information You Need

Visit Vote411.org to look up your personalized ballot. With VOTE411, you can:

get info on candidates, measures, and who supports them
check where, when, and how to vote
keep track of your choices and use them to vote
Learn More